JALUD Logo SOUND EVENT DETECTOR ← All Case Studies
Case Study / Případová studie 📅 September 16, 2026

Protecting Critical Infrastructure: When a Threat Is Heard First

SED acoustic detection adds alerts for events that cameras may miss. Experience from Pilsen and an airport security exercise shows how it can help in practice.
Protecting Critical Infrastructure: When a Threat Is Heard First

A window breaks behind a technical building. Someone screams near the entrance. The security operator has cameras available but is watching another part of the site. The first warning may only arrive when an employee reports the incident.

Sound Event Detector by JALUD adds another source of information. It recognises selected sound events and sends an alert to the monitoring system, helping the operator verify what is happening and initiate the appropriate response.

What can SED help identify?

🚨 Threats to people

Gunshots, panic screams and aggression near entrances, reception desks and staff areas.

🔨 Possible intrusion or damage

Breaking glass, grinding tools or spray activity around buildings and perimeter areas. Operators assess each alert in the context of its location, timing and authorised activities.

🛸 Drone activity around the site

Acoustic detection can complement other sensors by identifying UAV sounds. Performance depends on the drone type, ambient noise, weather and microphone placement. SED does not intercept or neutralise drones.

See how detection works with a camera

An example of acoustic detection working with a camera system. Automated camera steering requires the appropriate localisation setup and camera integration.

Pilsen: sound detection alongside municipal cameras

In Pilsen, Czech Republic, JALUD sound detectors complement the municipal CCTV system. The deployment illustrates how acoustic detection can become part of an existing monitoring environment.

For critical-infrastructure operators, the practical lesson is the same: connect detection to a monitoring team and a defined response procedure. An alert is most useful when someone can verify it and act.

Read the Pilsen deployment case study →

Airport exercise: how quickly did the alert arrive?

During a simulated security exercise in an administrative building at Václav Havel Airport Prague, researchers compared alerts from JALUD detectors with conventional incident reporting. In one scenario involving aggressive shouting, they recorded:

Notification method Time from the start of the incident
🚨 SED alert 5 seconds
📞 Telephone notification to security 30 seconds
These figures describe notification times in a specific exercise, rather than the arrival of a response team or a guarantee for every installation. In a scenario without a distinctive initial sound, SED did not provide the first alert. Read the published research and scenario results ↗

How could this work at your site?

Illustrative scenario: a window breaks at a technical building during the night.

  1. Detection: SED recognises the sound of breaking glass.
  2. Notification: the monitoring centre receives an alert identifying the detection location.
  3. Verification: the operator checks the situation, for example using an available camera.
  4. Response: security staff follow the site’s established procedure.

Integration with connected systems can help alerts reach the people responsible for responding.

Explore SED and KISS integration →

How does this support critical-infrastructure resilience?

From risk assessment to practical protection

The EU Critical Entities Resilience Directive (CER) establishes a framework for identified critical entities to assess risks and implement proportionate resilience measures. Articles 12 and 13 address risk assessment, physical protection, incident handling and continuity. Acoustic detection can support selected measures where a relevant threat produces a recognisable sound. Read the CER Directive in English ↗

The complementary NIS2 Directive addresses cybersecurity risk management and incident reporting. SED’s role in this article is physical-event detection; it does not replace the cybersecurity controls required for connected systems. Applicable obligations depend on national implementation and the organisation’s scope. Read the NIS2 Directive in English ↗

Installing SED alone does not establish compliance with either framework. Outside the EU, deployment should follow the relevant national and sector-specific requirements. The installation design should also address audio processing, optional short recordings and access permissions. Edge deployment enables local analysis and the transmission primarily of event information.

Test SED in your own environment

Start with a few locations and clearly defined sound scenarios. A pilot can assess detection in local noise conditions, unwanted alerts and how notifications fit into the security team’s daily work.

Discuss a pilot deployment →

Research and further reading

Related JALUD case studies and articles

Share this Article / Sdílet tento článek Direct permalink for social media & citations
LinkedIn X (Twitter) Facebook